Do You Know Your Cost Per Acquisition? (Most Business Owners Don't)
Ask any business owner what they spend to acquire a customer. Most can't answer. Some will guess. Either way, they're flying blind—and it's costing them thousands every month.

What's your cost per acquisition?
If you hesitated, guessed, or mentally noted to "check with your marketing person," you're not alone. Most business owners don't know this number. They're spending money every month to acquire customers without knowing what those customers actually cost.
You wouldn't hire an employee without knowing their salary. You wouldn't buy inventory without knowing the price. But you're running ads, building websites, doing SEO, and attending networking events without knowing your actual cost per customer.
That's a problem. And it's probably costing you more than you think.
The Most Important Number You Don't Know
Cost Per Acquisition (CPA) is simple: it's what you spend to acquire one customer. Total acquisition costs divided by new customers acquired.
For example:
- Spent $5,000 on marketing last month
- Acquired 25 new customers
- CPA = $200 per customer
Simple math. Critical information. Yet most business owners can't answer it.
Instead, they say things like:
- "I think it's around $50?" (It's actually $340)
- "My marketing agency handles that" (Do they though? Ask them.)
- "It varies a lot" (That's not an answer, that's an excuse)
- "I'm not sure how to calculate it" (See above—it's division)
The problem isn't that the math is hard. The problem is that most businesses aren't tracking the right things.
Why This Is Actually Dangerous
Not knowing your CPA isn't just an oversight. It's a strategic blindspot that leads to expensive mistakes.
Consider these scenarios:
Scenario 1: The Expensive Customer You're spending $10,000 per month on Google Ads. Feels like it's working—lots of clicks, decent traffic, people are buying. You estimate CPA is around $100.
Then someone actually does the math. Your real CPA is $380. Your average customer lifetime value? $420.
You're making $40 per customer before considering the cost to deliver your service. After delivery costs, support, and overhead, you're losing money on every sale. You've been congratulating yourself on growth while bleeding cash.
Scenario 2: The Missed Opportunity Your CPA from referrals is $50 (time spent networking, referral bonuses). From paid ads, it's $250. So you focus on referrals and keep ad spend minimal.
But here's what you don't know: customers from referrals have an LTV of $800. Customers from paid ads have an LTV of $3,200.
You're avoiding the channel that brings you the most valuable customers because you're only looking at acquisition cost, not customer value. You're leaving money on the table because you're optimizing for the wrong metric.
Scenario 3: The "Best" Channel Your Facebook ads get great engagement. Tons of clicks, lots of comments, people love your content. Your Google Ads get fewer clicks but seem okay. Based on traffic and engagement, Facebook feels like your best channel.
When you finally track conversions and calculate CPA:
- Facebook CPA: $420
- Google CPA: $180
Your "best" channel by vanity metrics is your worst channel by actual business results. You've been doubling down on the wrong strategy for months.
The Domino Effect of Not Knowing
CPA isn't just a vanity metric to track. It's the foundation for every growth decision you make.
Without CPA, you can't calculate LTV:CAC ratio (Lifetime Value to Customer Acquisition Cost). This ratio tells you if your business model works. A healthy ratio is 3:1 or better—you make three dollars for every dollar you spend acquiring a customer.
Without LTV:CAC, you don't know if you can scale profitably. You might have a great product, happy customers, and growing revenue—but terrible unit economics. Growth becomes a trap: the faster you grow, the faster you burn cash.
Without knowing which channels have good economics, you make random decisions:
- "Let's try Instagram!" (Why? Based on what data?)
- "SEO isn't working" (How do you know without tracking CPA by source?)
- "We need more traffic" (No, you need more customers at profitable economics)
Every strategic decision—pricing, marketing budget, hiring, product development—becomes guesswork without knowing your acquisition costs.
Why Business Owners Don't Track It
If CPA is so important, why don't more business owners track it?
1. "My marketing person handles that"
Maybe they do. But ask them right now: "What's our CPA by channel?" If they can't answer immediately with specific numbers, they're not tracking it either. Or they're tracking impressions, clicks, and engagement—which aren't the same as customers acquired.
2. "The data is all over the place"
Fair point. One customer comes from Google Ads, another from an Instagram post, another from a referral, another walked in after seeing your truck. Tracking is messy.
But messy tracking is better than no tracking. Even rough CPA numbers by channel give you dramatically better information than guessing.
3. "I don't know how to set it up"
This is fixable. You don't need a data science degree. You need:
- A way to track where customers come from (ask them, use UTM parameters, check analytics)
- A way to track what you spend (bank statements, ad dashboards)
- Basic division
Start simple. Perfect tracking later.
4. "I'm afraid of what I'll find"
This is the real reason. Ignorance feels better than uncomfortable truth. If you don't know your CPA, you can tell yourself your marketing is working. Once you know the numbers, you might discover you've been losing money for months.
But here's the thing: not knowing doesn't change reality. You're either losing money or you're not. The difference is whether you catch it now or six months from now when the damage is worse.
What Not Knowing Actually Costs
Let's get concrete about what this blindspot costs:
Lost Money on Unprofitable Channels
Imagine you're spending $3,000/month on a channel with a CPA of $400. Your customer LTV is $350. You're losing $50 per customer, which means you're burning $375/month on that channel alone (assuming 7-8 customers).
Over a year, that's $4,500 in pure waste. And that's just one channel.
Missed Revenue from Underfunding Good Channels
You're spending $1,000/month on a channel with a CPA of $100 and customer LTV of $800. That's an 8:1 return. You could spend $10,000/month on that channel and print money, but you don't because you're not tracking which channels actually work.
The opportunity cost? Potentially $72,000+ in profit you didn't make because you didn't know where to invest.
Strategic Mistakes Based on Bad Data
You decide to raise prices because "acquisition costs are too high." But you don't actually know your CPA, so you're making a major business decision based on a guess. Maybe your CPA is fine and the problem is customer retention. Or maybe your CPA is terrible but only for one channel that you should kill, not for all of them.
One wrong strategic decision based on missing data can cost you years of progress.
How to Actually Know Your CPA
Here's the framework:
Step 1: Track Total Acquisition Costs
Include everything you spend to acquire customers:
- Ad spend (Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
- Marketing tools and software
- Content creation costs
- SEO services
- Networking events and sponsorships
- Sales team salaries (or your time)
- Website costs allocated to acquisition
Be comprehensive. If you spend it to get customers, it counts.
Step 2: Count New Customers
This seems obvious, but define it clearly. Is a customer someone who:
- Made a purchase?
- Signed a contract?
- Booked a consultation?
- Paid a deposit?
Pick your definition and stick with it. Track it consistently.
Step 3: Calculate Overall CPA
Total acquisition costs ÷ New customers = CPA
Example: $8,000 in acquisition costs, 40 new customers = $200 CPA
This is your baseline number. But don't stop here.
Step 4: Break It Down by Channel
This is where it gets useful. Calculate CPA for each marketing channel:
- Google Ads CPA: Ad spend ÷ Customers from Google Ads
- Facebook Ads CPA: Ad spend ÷ Customers from Facebook Ads
- Referral CPA: Referral costs (bonuses, time) ÷ Referred customers
- Organic Search CPA: SEO costs ÷ Customers from organic search
You might discover:
- Google Ads: $150 CPA
- Facebook Ads: $380 CPA
- Referrals: $45 CPA
- Organic: $90 CPA (when you amortize SEO investment)
Now you know where to allocate budget.
Step 5: Factor in Customer Quality
Not all customers are equal. A $100 CPA customer who spends $5,000 is better than a $50 CPA customer who spends $200 and churns immediately.
Calculate CPA alongside customer lifetime value (LTV) by channel:
- Channel A: $200 CPA, $1,200 LTV → 6:1 ratio (great)
- Channel B: $80 CPA, $300 LTV → 3.75:1 ratio (okay)
- Channel C: $150 CPA, $150 LTV → 1:1 ratio (losing money)
Channel C looks "cheaper" than Channel A, but it's actually destroying value. Without tracking both CPA and LTV by source, you'd never know.
What Changes When You Know It
Once you know your CPA by channel, everything changes.
You Kill Bad Channels
That Facebook campaign with $400 CPA and $300 LTV? Gone. Immediately. You just freed up budget to invest in channels that actually work.
Even if it "feels" like it's working—lots of engagement, brand awareness, reach—if the economics don't work, it doesn't work. Kill it.
You Double Down on Good Channels
That Google Ads campaign with $180 CPA and $2,000 LTV? That's an 11:1 return. You should be spending as much as possible there until the economics change.
Most business owners under-invest in channels that work because they're "expensive" on an absolute basis. A $200 CPA feels expensive—until you realize that customer is worth $3,000.
You Make Better Pricing Decisions
When you know your CPA, you can model pricing changes:
- If we raise prices 20%, we might lose 15% of customers, but revenue still goes up
- If we lower prices 10% to compete, we need 50% more customers to break even—can our CPA support that?
Pricing decisions become math problems, not guesses.
You Know When You Can Scale
Venture-backed companies obsess over LTV:CAC ratio because it tells them if they can scale profitably. If your ratio is 4:1 or better, you can usually raise money or reinvest profits to grow aggressively.
If your ratio is 1.5:1, you can't scale without fixing unit economics first. Growth would just accelerate your path to bankruptcy.
Without knowing CPA, you don't know which scenario you're in.
The Uncomfortable Truth
Here's what tracking CPA reveals for most businesses:
Your "best" channel probably isn't. The channel with the most traffic, engagement, or vanity metrics often has terrible economics. Your quietest channel might be your most profitable.
You're wasting 30-50% of your marketing budget. Not because you're bad at marketing—because you're optimizing for the wrong things. Traffic and engagement don't pay bills. Customers at profitable economics do.
Some of your customers are unprofitable. Not just low-margin—actually unprofitable. The cost to acquire them plus the cost to serve them exceeds what they pay. You'd be better off not having them.
Your instincts are probably wrong. What "feels" like it's working often isn't. What seems expensive is often your best investment. Data will humble you.
This is uncomfortable. But it's also the path to building a business that works.
The Bottom Line
You can't optimize what you don't measure. You can't scale what you don't understand. And you can't make smart growth decisions without knowing what it costs to acquire a customer.
Most business owners don't know their CPA. They're guessing at one of the most important numbers in their business. That's expensive.
The good news? This is fixable. Start tracking today:
- Calculate total acquisition costs this month
- Count new customers this month
- Do the division
- Break it down by channel
- Compare to customer lifetime value
You'll learn more in one month of tracking than in a year of guessing. And you'll probably discover opportunities to cut costs and increase revenue that you never knew existed.
If you need help setting up proper conversion tracking and understanding your real acquisition costs, let's talk. I've seen too many businesses waste money on marketing that doesn't work—simply because they couldn't measure what was actually working.
Stop guessing. Start measuring. Your business will thank you.